Introduction
This article includes the guidelines which can be utilized under defined circumstances but appropriate decisions can be taken by scientific justification
Scope
This document can provide guidance to validation issues for sterile and non sterile dosage forms and biologicals.
Purpose
These guidelines tend to indicate what is expected to be covered by fabricators, packagers but doesn’t encompass all the intended factors as they can vary according to different drug products. These guidelines can be applied on general level for establishing a comprehensive approach to validation
General
Product parameters like quality, safety, and efficacy should be considered by evaluating quality materials or components, product design, process design, control of various processes and in –process control and testing of end product.
Phases of Validation
The activities in accordance with the validation studies are classified into three phases
Phase I/ Pre Validation or Qualification Phase
This phase includes all activities relating to product research & development, formulation, scale up studies, pilot batch studies, stability conditions, technology transfer to commercial scale batches, handling & storage of in process & finished dosage forms, equipment qualification, installation qualification, operational qualification, master production documents, process capability.
Phase II/ Process Validation Phase
This phase verifies that established limits of critical process parameters are valid. It ensures that satisfactory products are not mentioned under worst conditions
Phase III/ Maintenance Phase
This phase requires frequent process review relating to documents, validation audit reports so they are no deviations or failures or modifications to production process. This phase further ensures that all sops have been followed including change control procedures.
Validation Protocol
Validation protocol is a written plan depicting how validation should be conducted along with their test parameters, product specifications, equipment used in production and packaging and final end decision points on test results.
If the validation protocol is changed or modified then the change should be justified and documented.
The validation protocol should be duly signed with date and numbering and it should include the following
Validation Master Plan
Validation master plan is the document which gives company’s philosophy, intention and approaches for establishing performance adequacy.
The management should agree on validation master plan and in accordance with authorized standard operating procedures
It should provide an overview of entire validation operation, organizational structure, content and planning.
All the activities relating to validation like critical technical operations in accordance with product and process controls within a company should be validated
It should be clear, concise, brief and should refer to policy documents, validation protocols, reports and SOPs. The format and content should include the following
Types of Validation
i) Prospective Validation – It involves establishment of documented evidence of what a system does or what it purposes based on plan. It is done before distribution of a new product
ii) Retrospective Validation – It involves establishment of documented evidence of what a system does or what is its purpose based on the review and analysis of available information. It is done on already distributed product based on production, testing and control data.
iii) Concurrent Validation - It involves establishment of documented evidence of what a system does or it purposes on the information generated while implementing system.
iv)Revalidation – revalidation is done when changes in packaging, formulation, processes, equipment occurs which could alter product effectiveness or product specifications.
When changes in critical component, facility, plant, change in batch size or any batches that fail to be according to specifications of product or process
Change Control – It is a formal system where appropriate personnel from concerned departments review the changes that are prone to affect the validated status.
The change is addressed and documented accordingly.
A request for change should be made initially in formal manner with a form and signature
Based on the request the impact of the change on quality of the product is defined as either as minor or major change
If there is no impact on product quality then it can be implemented by owner with appropriate documentation
Minor changes can be done in short period and efficiently with the help of standard changes list approved by quality department
In case of major change quality department should be involved and a thorough action plan should be made.
After the plan is approved by the quality department it can be implemented.
Emergency cases should be defined by the organization and the change request can be formalized after replacement
Personnel
The validation team is to define progress and approve the documentation generated. This team would include the following members
Production Manager – incharge of manufacturing batches and review of protocols and reports
QC Manager – Analysis of the collected samples
QC Executive – Sample collection and Submission to QC
Maintenance Manager – Provides support for utilities and engineering
Production Executive – Protocol preparation and manufacturing of validation batches
QA Manager – Protocol authorization and preparation of summary report
Validation, pre validation, change control, revalidation, concurrent validation, retrospective validation, prospective validation, validation master plan, validation protocol